Mental Mutilation, Part 2: Innovation Imprisoned
The force that has allowed our educational system to deteriorate to its current condition is simple: incentive.
Books like Freakonomics share the obvious revelation that humans do nothing without incentive. Incentive is the fuel that drives all human activity, from our careers to our diets to our sexuality. Incentive is the motive power behind every human system at every level of complexity.
In the case of American education, this motive force isn’t hitched to anything that might benefit our children. Because the overwhelming bulk of our schools are funded through government taxation that has no chance of disappearing, no incentive exists for schools to innovate and improve. Want proof? Examine literally every other industry’s history since 1907. Small grocers have given way to Wal-Mart super centers and distribution hubs wired together by incredibly complex computer software programs that manage logistics without human intervention. Automobiles have gone from slow, rickety buggies to blazing hulks of shiny, sexy metal. Entertainment has quantum leaped from live performance to motion pictures to home televisions to interactive games.
Literally any industry you can conceive of has reinvented itself hundreds of times in a hundred years and barely resembles its atavistic forms.
Yet, in 1907 education consisted of crowding a group of young children into a room. They all learned the same things together. They all enjoyed a yearly progression from one stage to the next.
Does this sound nauseatingly familiar?
Yet how does this stasis occur? What factors allowed its creation and conspired to preserve its existence?
In the other examples I cited, incentives existed for pioneers to do things differently. Fortunes were won on the backs of good ideas. Filo T. Farnsworth, Sam Walton, Steve Jobs, Walt Disney, Henry Ford, to barely begin a list, these men had the vision for a new world unshackled from the constraints that they knew were unnecessary. Part of what drove them was the power of their ability to imagine big solutions to big problems. The rest was incentive — the knowledge that they would be rewarded for their insights.
Because K-12 education is jailed within the constraints of all levels of bureaucracy, no such rewards exist for its innovators. Moreover, even the most altruistic of innovators will find no toehold in the mirror-smooth, impermeable surface of the government monolith that stands between themselves and the future of education.